Like with their etiological philosophy, i discovered that participants’ perspectives about precisely how hereditary knowledge you are going to work with or harm some one and you will area had been diverse. Actually respondents’ rules of what can qualify “helpful” in place of what can meet the requirements “harmful” so you can homosexuals varied rather. Including, although several respondents ideal you to definitely enhanced hereditary understanding of homosexuality manage in some way increase societal and you can/otherwise individuals’ enjoy out of homosexuality, particular thought that for example a shift inside viewpoints might possibly be a good beneficial lead whereas others viewed this exact same lead since hazardous. Likewise, certain users indexed the possibility of hereditary technologies to remove homosexuality as actually a poor prospective result of increased hereditary degree, whereas others ideal one to such as an effect would be favorable. Given this, it is difficult so you’re able to predict the possibility perception people coming hereditary discoveries get with the lifestyle from lgbt somebody, especially associated with alterations in public formula regarding adoption, relationships, and you may discrimination law. It’s demonstrably suggested from these overall performance, yet not, that people that have extremely polar viewpoints with the things nearby homosexuality have a tendency to yes look for, and simply select, utilizing people the brand new genetic information you to definitely arise toward their etiology to help with this new moral and you may sociopolitical agendas most congruent having their feedback.